UnIntelLitLikeIzis cause itiz .. iow .. mind the flap flowin in ... mind the opsweep / speed factor / gap / scalater escapaytour scalage between chippin boulders & dustin turds and the long broken stickend: hyper run & scale away jewhiplash
Werner Hamacher "95 Theses on Philology" | Deconstruction and Radical Philology Gavin Young Philosophy -- 10.7K subscribers ------ Jun 7, 2025 In this lecture, I discuss Werner Hamacher's "95 Theses on Philology", one of two parts of his "Minima Philologica". In it, Hamacher attempts to theorize, investigate, and discover a path for the study of language in all its subtleties, ambiguities, and strategies. Using allusive aphorisms, Hamacher builds on ideas from deconstruction and post-Heideggerian thinking to yield an exciting attempt at a theory of the study of language, writing, and reading. Enjoy!
Join the channel for $5/month to gain access to, among other things, a monthly philosophy Zoom tailored to your educational needs! / @gavinyoung-philosophy
Kinky Joyce: Friend or Foe in Finnegans Wake? | Desire and the Reader-Wr...
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
0:00 a little known fact about James Joyce is 0:02 that he had a kink or a fetish for 0:04 women's underpants and this finally 0:07 becomes the context for an entire 0:09 chapter in the first chapter of book two 0:11 of Finnegan's Wake the mime of the 0:13 Mcnick and the Maggis and in this 0:15 chapter Shem in the guise of a new 0:18 character Glug as he's called is asked 0:21 to come up and try to guess the color of 0:24 Isabelle and her 29 rainbow girls' 0:27 panties and the correct answer here is 0:30 helotrope but this word proves totally 0:34 ambiguous in the chapter first off 0:36 because it has a number of different 0:37 possible meanings and associations such 0:40 that any one guess is technically 0:42 inadequate because it's not grasping the 0:44 entirety of the other meanings it could 0:46 be seen as deficient or sliding by 0:48 without getting at the facts straight on 0:51 without understanding the facts of 0:53 feminine clothingaring as it's called 0:55 and I think that phrase is really 0:57 important because it shows how even the 0:59 enveloping structure of a text is always 1:02 airing always in a process of diverance 1:05 as Dareda would put it in this video I 1:09 would like to think and theorize about 1:11 Finnegan's Wake as a kinky text which is 1:14 to say concerned with the word or 1:16 concept kink in the double sense of a 1:20 sexual fetish or you know something 1:22 sexually unorthodox and a kind of knot 1:25 or sharp bend or twist in something that 1:28 would otherwise be straight such as a 1:29 garden hose right and this cuts off the 1:32 flow of something that would otherwise 1:33 be there thus a kink is a discontinuity 1:36 a rupture or a 1:38 lacuna and I'll go back to those latter 1:40 three later in the lecture but right now 1:44 I want to focus on how we can explicate 1:46 the nature of kink fetish and desire as 1:50 a fundamental linguistic trope and 1:53 vehicle in Finnegan's Wake 1:57 [Music] 2:02 one of the reasons this concept is so 2:04 important here is because it really gets 2:06 at the relationship between Joyce as 2:08 author and us as readers is he our 2:12 friend here trying to invite us in or is 2:15 he our foe trying to keep us at bay with 2:17 various tropes and defensive mechanisms 2:20 because one thing we know about the 2:22 dream of Finnegan's wake is that it is 2:24 filled with repression and thereby the 2:27 only way that we can get a sense of 2:29 presence is through a deferred chain of 2:33 differential marks as Dareda would put 2:35 it and in this process there are a 2:37 number of psychic mechanisms used to 2:40 distance the dreamer from his or her own 2:43 concepts ideas and 2:45 preoccupations thus Finnegan Wig's 2:47 language is by definition oblique it 2:51 works by extension and temporal deferral 2:56 as such it makes language kinky as well 3:00 by showing the kinks already present in 3:03 language in all forms of discourse it 3:06 shows that they are partial which is a 3:08 term that I use often on the channel 3:10 partial in the sense of gapladen and 3:12 biased right 3:14 so this weaponizes language and 3:17 discourse itself by making it a poignant 3:20 vehicle for desire and thereby also for 3:22 all the different manifestations that 3:24 desire can take excess disgust fear 3:28 repression anxiety depression and more 3:32 therefore Finnegan's wake is not 3:34 speaking for some teological 3:36 understanding of the mind or of the 3:39 world as Sheldon Brivik says the 3:41 discourse of Finnegan's Wake 3:43 accommodates multitudes it speaks for 3:45 multiple voices it genuinely tries to 3:49 accommodate the difference that is sort 3:52 of latent within our conception of 3:54 desire as excess and overflowing beyond 3:58 rational categories 4:00 as such the geometry of Finnegan's wake 4:03 in its sort of desirous turning over and 4:06 mulling over itself is that of a moious 4:09 strip an emobius strip is an otherwise 4:12 circular structure with a half twist in 4:15 it such that it intertwines with itself 4:18 it is interrelated and interdependent to 4:21 itself it has two sides which are really 4:24 the same side of the same structure thus 4:28 it is the oraoros but twisted again in 4:31 another dimension that the oraoros 4:34 um geometry hasn't typically allowed 4:37 for as such this is not only the 4:40 geometry of the text but also the nature 4:43 of the reader writer network he is 4:47 constantly twisting and pulling his 4:49 reader legs trying to get them to go 4:52 down rabbit holes just like the 4:53 characters and yet at the same time he's 4:55 thereby inviting them in to the 4:58 character's unconscious and letting the 5:00 characters minds run free and we are 5:04 thereby implicated in this process and 5:08 this idea of implication is really 5:10 interesting because implicate comes from 5:13 late middle English and before that from 5:15 the Latin implicatus for folded in the 5:19 past participle of 5:22 implicate is to 5:25 intertwine so we have a very interesting 5:27 case here where the reader has to 5:30 actively construct a text that is not 5:32 formally there before the reading begins 5:36 right there are sort of loose structural 5:39 indices markers and signs that point us 5:42 in certain directions but they work at 5:44 best 5:45 probabilistically they don't give us 5:47 sense 5:48 certainty they merely give us rabbit 5:52 holes to go down they give us lines of 5:54 flight as dozen would call it this 5:57 accords with Gabrielle Rangley's theory 5:59 of spectral authorship which he 6:01 elaborates in Joyce as theory 6:03 hermeneutic ethics in derided lon and 6:05 Finnegan's wake and this text goes to a 6:08 great deal to try to explain the nature 6:10 of authorship in 6:12 deconstruction because bot famously 6:14 theorized the death of the author but 6:17 wrangling actually wants to say that no 6:19 the author is not dead even dereda 6:21 acknowledged this the author is just 6:22 there as a trace or as wrangling calls 6:25 it a spectre 6:27 Therefore there is no mode of speaking 6:29 that remains undistorted by iterability 6:32 and ventriloquism he says whenever it is 6:35 consulted authorities pronouncements 6:37 emerge as the result of a negotiation 6:40 that already mixes and confuses 6:42 positions and beneath this dynamic of 6:45 displacement there is a mechanism at 6:47 work that divides even the author from 6:49 any interpretive authority in the sense 6:51 of total mastery over what they 6:53 produce right so we're getting this 6:56 implicated nature of the mobious form 7:00 right where both sides are really both 7:04 different and the same at the same 7:07 time he says language refuses to codify 7:10 a single authentic intention without 7:13 also dividing it wrenching it from 7:15 itself and transforming it in multiple 7:17 and unpredictable ways 7:20 therefore authoral meaning he says far 7:22 from constituting a pragmatic solution 7:25 that cuts through the paradoxes of those 7:27 terms is a concept structurally 7:30 analogous to them we call something a 7:32 meaning intended by the author with 7:34 reference to certain textual effects the 7:37 impossibility of distinguishing 7:39 legitimate from illegitimate effects 7:40 with absolute certainty therefore means 7:43 that the author too is a presence 7:45 constituted by our interpretive 7:47 decisions and this idea of 7:49 decision-making is really important for 7:51 Wrangley because he says that any theory 7:53 of interpretation demands that there is 7:55 some fundamental discontinuity between 7:57 the text and the interpretation that 8:00 results right that we can't get a 8:02 one-to-one correspondence between the 8:05 data quote unquote of the text of the 8:08 empirical facts of the matter to the 8:11 spectre that we invent that we claim 8:14 speaks for Joyce and in Joyce's voice as 8:18 we're doing that we are constructing 8:20 retrospectively what we see as being the 8:23 most authentic image of Joyce which is 8:25 itself based upon a number of decisions 8:28 and assumptions none of which can be 8:30 exhausted 8:32 and this is what's crucial here for our 8:34 understanding of the relationship 8:36 between Joyce and therefore his fetish 8:38 and the way that this implicates us in a 8:41 discourse of desire is that 8:43 conceptualizing authority as spectral 8:45 underlines our implication in the text 8:48 as producers of meaning on the other 8:51 hand the powers that specters 8:52 nonetheless wield including powers of 8:55 dictation can tell us that if the 8:58 meaning thus produced is not neatly 9:00 divisible into elements that partake and 9:02 elements that do not partake in the 9:04 authority bestowed by an authoral 9:05 blessing this does not mean that the 9:08 notion of authority is 9:10 abandoned joyce still leaves something 9:12 for us how did we get Finnegan's Wake 9:14 otherwise 9:16 what divides our readings from authority 9:18 is the uncertainty of their relation to 9:20 it and this uncertainty cuts both ways 9:23 it perpetuates authority in the very act 9:25 of putting it into question right just 9:28 as the Mobius strip perpetuates each 9:31 side while eacing it in the 9:33 process like Daredus Plato who inventing 9:36 Socrates takes on a debt and 9:39 responsibility towards the fictional 9:40 father figure the reader who is at the 9:43 risk of usurping the position to be 9:45 consulted is also tied to this position 9:48 as the one to be iterated and interacted 9:50 with this and I think this is very 9:52 interesting right that we are 9:54 interacting with Joyce in a fundamental 9:56 way we're having some sort of 9:58 conversation but rather than it being a 10:00 dialogue it is a polyogue and this is a 10:04 word that Finnegan's awake uses many 10:05 times in fact in in varying guises that 10:09 we are using multiple different 10:11 languages multiple different discourses 10:14 to try to understand the lack of any 10:17 meta discourse that there is no one 10:20 trope no one schema no one matrix that 10:24 can subsume the entirety of any text and 10:27 thus of any mind or anything that 10:30 desires and try to reduce it to set 10:33 mechanisms desire is by its very 10:36 definition productive in the duloarian 10:39 sense and therefore always exceeding any 10:41 single gesture because desire must 10:43 repeat itself it must propagate itself 10:46 properly speaking it's a sort of virus 10:49 that goes beyond anyone logic that is 10:51 able to 10:52 evolutionarily accompany and accommodate 10:55 any environment or vehicle but Patrick A 10:58 mccarthy clarifies in his essay a 11:00 warping process which can be found in 11:03 work in progress Joyce centenery essays 11:06 that Joyce and his reader are ultimately 11:08 partners not antagonists 11:11 if the reader cannot hope to understand 11:13 exactly what Joyce meant when he wrote 11:15 the book it is equally true that the 11:17 book lives only in the experience of its 11:19 readers and has no set meaning apart 11:21 from that experience right so where 11:23 needed why would Joyce write this and 11:25 spent 17 years on it if he didn't want 11:27 it to be read 11:29 although he makes many demands on his 11:31 readers Joyce accords them a place of 11:33 honor in keeping with Stern's dictim 11:35 that the truest respect which you can 11:37 pay to the reader's understanding is to 11:39 have this matter amicably and leave him 11:42 something to imagine as well as yourself 11:45 precisely so and it is this reliance on 11:47 the reader's cooperation not to mention 11:49 his goodwill knowledge sense of humor 11:52 patience and insomnia that defines 11:54 Joyce's attitude towards his audience 11:58 right so there's a mix of leg pulling of 12:01 occultting while at the same time a 12:03 sense of charitability and relationship 12:06 because Joyce is fundamentally 12:08 infatuated with relationships and he 12:11 wants to see that the readership that we 12:15 engage in is one of a relationship with 12:18 textuality with a fulminating excessive 12:21 medium that tries to tell us things 12:23 without communicating facts right 12:27 without claiming that what happens in 12:29 Finnegan's Wake somehow corresponds to a 12:32 world no it is beyond correspondence it 12:34 is in a sense a world of its own 12:36 isolated and yet at the same time it 12:38 always opens up and demands that it be 12:41 opened up that's why every time I'm next 12:43 to Finan's Wake I just have to open up a 12:44 passage and just read something because 12:46 it just compels me and this is a 12:48 fundamentally desirous impulse right 12:51 that we want to implicate ourselves in 12:53 the text and the text wants to implicate 12:55 itself in us that's why there's so much 12:56 self-reflexivity and doubt in Finnegan's 13:00 Wake therefore the kinky text of 13:03 Finnegan's Wake opens up and exposes 13:06 kings and analyzes them as indeterminate 13:10 spaces between any two points that 13:14 allows for play 13:16 play conceived of in the dual sense of 13:18 fun like playing a game but also play as 13:21 in the quality of limited free reign 13:25 between two like machined parts for 13:27 example right there's a little space of 13:29 play in between where it can sort of 13:31 jiggle around there is a sort of limited 13:33 movement allowed between relative 13:36 fedters 13:38 these two aspects of play are really key 13:41 to understanding the relationship of 13:43 Joyce to kings because at once we can 13:46 see that Joyce is kind of in a sort of 13:49 flagagillatory manner playing with 13:52 himself therefore it's of course 13:54 sexually explicit and filled with 13:56 innuendo and yet at the same time he's 13:58 also playing with us in the sense of 14:01 perhaps exciting us sexually but also 14:04 playing with us in the sense of two 14:07 members of some common game but thirdly 14:12 playing at our expense right as if you 14:15 play a prank on someone and they are the 14:17 sort of butt of some joke so there are a 14:20 number of different facets to 14:22 understanding Finnegan's wake as a kinky 14:24 text it is at once concerned with play 14:28 and joy and excess while at the same 14:30 time being marred in repression anxiety 14:34 disgust fear and 14:37 self-loathing therefore Finnegan's Wake 14:39 teaches us as well as leaves space for 14:42 us to enjoy play that is at once 14:44 innocent and benign and at the same time 14:47 sexually illicit and excessive this is 14:50 the reason we never kind of figure out 14:51 what the crime of Finnegan's wake 14:54 is as such I think this is a really 14:56 helpful way for approaching Finnegan's 14:58 Wake because it helps one foreground the 15:01 pleasure of the text the extent to which 15:03 it really exudes personality so I think 15:06 this idea of Finnegan's Wake as a kinky 15:08 text can be really incisive for 15:10 understanding the reading experience 15:12 understanding how Finneian's wake 15:14 privileges ambiguity such as between the 15:17 writer and reader but just in general 15:19 the various happenings that happen in 15:21 Finineian's wake are defined by 15:24 ambiguity discontinuity rupture lacuna 15:27 occultting 15:29 deference fleeing dancing and constantly 15:33 exceeding through gesture right it 15:36 doesn't exceed through conceptual leaps 15:39 without any sort of substance but write 15:42 they are filled with concrete gestures 15:45 i'm reminded of Heran's concept of the 15:48 bub of the solid word which is very 15:52 similar to what Stuart Gilbert has to 15:54 say in his prologina to work in progress 15:56 that can be found in our exagination 15:58 where he says that the word building of 16:00 work in progress is founded on the rock 16:02 of petrified language of sounds with 16:04 solid 16:06 associations and the solidity or ground 16:09 or the unground in a way of finning wake 16:13 language is desire 16:15 in all the excesses of feeling and 16:18 affect therefore I ask you to go forth 16:20 not only in reading Finnegan's Wake but 16:22 in any text by focusing on the affective 16:25 immediiacy of desire and of the text 16:28 which demands to exceed any 16:30 interpretation i think that this can 16:32 really productively understand the 16:35 experience that Joyce wants us to glean 16:36 from Finnegan's Wake as well as the sort 16:39 of political and ethical implications 16:40 that we can take from the way that we 16:42 interpret it 16:44 so that being said that's it for this 16:46 lecture i hope it's been somewhat 16:48 interesting and helpful you can check 16:49 out any of my other lectures I've done 16:51 on postmodernism German idealism gender 16:53 theory postcolonial studies and other 16:55 classic literature you can also become a 16:57 channel member for $5 a month and gain 16:59 access to among other things a private 17:01 philosophy zoom which you can tailor to 17:03 your needs i also have super thanks if 17:05 you'd just like to donate to the channel 17:06 because it really helps me purchase all 17:08 the varying books of various kinds and 17:10 bring you all this wonderful secondary 17:12 literature but no pressure care about 17:13 yourself first that's it for this 17:15 lecture and I'll see you in another one 17:20 [Music]
Kinky Joyce: Friend or Foe in Finnegans Wake? | Desire and the Reader-Writer Relationship Gavin Young Philosophy 10.7K subscribers
212 views Jun 8, 2025
In this lecture, I theorize Finnegans Wake as a "kinky text", using the term "kink" in its dual sense: 1) a sexual tabboo/fetish, and 2) a knot or sharp bend/twist in something otherwise straight -- thereby, a distontinuity, rupture, gap, or lacuna. Using Gabriel Renggli's concept of the spectral author, I chart the ways by which Joyce implicates his readers in himself and his text, showing how he weaves a textual geometry in the shape of a Möbius strip. Enjoy!
Music is Pierre Boulez's Piano Sonata No. 1 • Piano Sonata №.1 - Pierre Boulez (1946)
Join the channel for $5/month to gain access to, among other things, a monthly philosophy Zoom tailored to your educational needs! / @gavinyoung-philosophy
People mentioned 1 person James Joyce Irish novelist and poet (1882–1941)
Gavin Young Philosophy 10.7K subscribers
30:21 Rhythm in Finnegans Wake: Boulez, Zones of Intensity, and Alliterative Resistance
1:07:57 Critical Essays on Finnegans Wake | A Literature Review for Interpreting the Wake
32:47 Dissemination: Derrida and Finnegans Wake's L(e/i)tters
Syphilis Is Changing Like We've Never Seen... In Seattle Heme Review 467K views 2 weeks ago
19:52 Sandra Bartky "On Psychological Oppression" | Autonomy in the Shackles of Patriarchy• 363 views 3 days ago
New 23:19 Giambattista Vico, "The New Science" | A Philosophy of the History of Human Ideas and Institutions Gavin Young Philosophy 455 views 1 month ago
Rhythm in Finnegans Wake: Boulez, Zones of Intensity, and Alliterative Resistance Gavin Young Philosophy • 587 views 7 days ago
"De EU Is Niet Meer Te Redden" Met Ab Flipse Hete Hangijzers • 22K views 2 days ago
Let's Talk About James Joyce's Finnegans Wake George Koors • 727 views 5 months ago
Why All Knowledge is Political | Foucault and Joyce on Power and Epistemology Gavin Young Philosophy • 27K views 4 weeks ago
The Genius Philosophy of Kafka (And How To Use It In Your Life) Timur Dyrdin • 5.8K views 4 weeks ago
10,000 Subscribers Q&A! Gavin Young Philosophy • 442 views 11 days ago
Finnegans Wake Book 1: Complete Reading (10 hours, WAKE Podcast) WAKE: Cold Reading Finnegans Wake • 631 views 4 months ago
Ukraine drone attack shatters peace summit The Grayzone • 528 views 1 hour ago
New Theo van Gogh interviewt Herman Brusselmans Zihni Ozdil • 1.3K views 18 hours ago
New J.S. Bach - Cantata BWV 120 "Gott, man lobet dich in der Stille" (J.S. Bach Foundation) Bachstiftung • 42K views 3 years ago
Is "Unintelligible" Literature Even Worth Your Time? | Answering a Common Question Gavin Young Philosophy • 7.1K views 1 month ago
Peter Sloterdijk on Europe, Meister Eckhart, and the Spirit of Democracy Berggruen Institute • 6.4K views 2 days ago
New How Solarpunk Could Solve Capitalism's Major Greed Problem Em's Wild World • 142K views 1 month ago Max Blumenthal attends AI warlord conference The Grayzone • 355 views 51 minutes ago
New A Conversation with DarksydePhil - Mad at the Internet (August 26, 2024) MATI Archive #410 • 15K views 9 months ago
Finnegans Wake Audiobook || Book I Chapter 1 -- James Joyce 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐒𝐓 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐏𝐀𝐍𝐘 • 172K views 9 years ago
Beamtin wegen Kritik an Israel entlassen mit Melanie Schweizer - 99 ZU EINS - Ep. 517 99 ZU EINS • 1.9K views 12 hours ago
01/05 ----- 12Mirror ---- k38 ---- 27/10: {lot} Yahweh is a cosmic parasite - Ryan Dawson today sorry, i fooled you too, this is a concrete, cobbles and wood video ..
moot Qs? porn finally finding its footin w spare -none- poopshootin? .. more compost toilet choices and micro climates than genders .... ??
equally ... together and or separately ... ... for setting a Gestalt into this world .... or lending an oldie but goodie some much needed upgrade ...
don't let Josh Moon the Gates of Hell Bouncer and King of Modern Acceler Azionist Game Dumbage teach you different .. nor his orc armies, nerd legions and zoggy zillions
YESTERDAY:
jf? the dusty [smith] show is up to the 4th long part in a year https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_6vhTF_OUU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzSm8C0hgqs part 4 is hard hitting .. and real plausible.. but until a much nicer and damn near magical version is disproven i shall reserve judgement ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6USluqkiuE via a mirror: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41h42L05IWw JF tells his story - The Real Housewives of Alberta Colonel J (The Sheriff) --- 2.36K subscribers --- 365 views Premiered Apr 9, 2025
TODAY:
watch?v=9QdiwqoAZRE Full length video - with "She's dead" thumbnail. By minor sektur lolcow Johnny Fox ( who had a run in with grapey back in the day on kill stream) Though to be fair Fox does watchable catfish and scambait stuff on YT mainly nowadays. destiny confuses 2 separate times and jf finds it hard to accept her online outburst might as well apply to him at least somewhat and/or sometimes to him as to his guest 'nwg' ... but he's right, she is mostly sane ... and i love her .. and him .. for keeping the john galt 'escape hatchapatch alive ... what have we left on the way to feminance approved trillionaire smallpoxblanket coverage?
re: last few minutes here ...... Bonnell/'Destiny' confuses and/or conflates 2 separate times and different outcomes and jf finds it hard to accept the latter one, her online outburst might as well, at least somewhat and/or sometimes, apply to him as to his guest 'nwg' [she from wendigo cunttree 'membu´?] ... but he's right, she is mostly sane ... and i love her .. and him .. for keeping the john galt 'escape hatchapatch alive ... what have we left on the way to feminance approved trillionaire smallpoxblanket coverage? Can bears be taught to plant and keep an eye on the 'thrivalage' of nuttrees and their descendant become respected members of nonspeciest societies? You bet.
https://twitter.com/ExtrapolationSF/status/1378100091635007488 Call to review Critique of Fantasy trilogy [april 2021]
p 749+2 [quotes mostly] of this: http://archive.org/details/piety-piet-close-up-or-closeted-up --- 832 pages ..
to page 106 of CoF: :::piet: listen to Auron McIntyre explaining the NRX [neo-reactionary] term 'moldbug' [CYarvin] invented for the hegelian "cutting edge of consensus competitions" ..... raging among the enlarging of the largest, racing to larpopia i might add the rest is here:
page 106 [ on wishing well, plagiarism and overseen / interspersed wish fantaseeing, using quotes from Adorno's 1952 diagnosis .... Meanwhile, if you ask me, taken for izm arks the markspotter instruction / prophecy / recipe for false flaggerIZum:
LR introducing TA: The infernal rear view of power is staggered in fits and starts:
"Encouraging 'behind-the-scenes' activities is an inconspicuous form of conjuring up such tendencies usually projected upon out-groups. [...] The advice to finagle is countered - undone in the psychoanalytic sense - by interspersed reminders to keep within the realm of the permissible" (79).
LR introducing another TA snip: The omnipotence in wish fantasying that pumps up outer reality makes the adjustment to a greater power that calls the shots:
"The pleasures ordained are no longer pleasures at all, but really the duties as which they are rationalized, the rationalization containing more truth than the supposedly unconscious wish" (66).
::piet:: the cathedral of cultural marxism again:
LR: That Leo Lowenthal is occasionally given the credit means that it was, biographically speaking, an occasional formulation that subsequently, however, grew like a rumor in meaningfulness. ............ Freud also argued that every daydream bears, just the same, the datemark of its triggering in the present going on recent past, whereby a portal opens to the underworld of the fantasy in history. It is one of those moments of breakthrough in analytic theory that can be seen as giving the how-to for proper conduct of psychic reality. In your daydream, however, as Freud argues, the fantasy arc jettisons the wish from an idealized past directly to the future of fulfillment. This can be taken to be owner's manual instructions for imagineers. The reversal of psychoanalysis is the gist of Adorno's plagiarism by the culture industry. Edmund Bergler was one psychoanalyst who claimed exper- tise in understanding plagiarism. However he had to treat it more carefully than, for example, writer's block. Intellectual property theft can only be looked at closely, he admits, and case by case. Only historically does it come into focus at all. It is at once a byproduct of "publicity" and a "privilege" of the limited set of people pursuing scientific, literary, or artistic vocations: "other persons have little opportunity to plagiarize even should they want to."
in the following and last paragraph of the 3 tome book he proves to shtick to his old gun, .. not quite as goldy at heart as moldy thru out i am afraid. He hasn't lost his ide fix of being the first survivor of enspecie ... & faceasy .. unable to elide permanence from his mentalicacy and masturbatory slide .. no earth from rock without slipping away to set up a roll powered rougher rub for the empowdered rollcall of divine couplement. "....the ultimate teen wish to get past reproduction and death."
Cabin in the Woods Movie Review Stream w/Jason Myles & Toure Reed Give Them An Argument w/Ben Burgis 24.9K subscribers 359 views Streamed live 10 hours ago Ben Burgis, Jason Myles, and Touré Reed continue their monthly-ish discussion of horror movies by talking about Joss Whedon's 2011 horror-comedy
