New Digs - FGP #60

11/09 ----- 3Monkey - k171 --- 20/02: {lot}
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNjVS4NTPo
Dist
     
Dear Dave, i long for the day the word christianity starts resonating 'anthropofixentrick' .. to imply cucking to spoilt femmies [comfort, security as compensation for lost earlier {and grounded} forms of matrist 'herbrule' being turned into matroony A:  fucktoryfresh cannon fodders, B: voting 'headblocks' and C: sorry '[s]excusage' for heirs turnin out all runty and autistic [gamerready!} in order to hunt for the one in a miljan weaponizable savantry to really sweep the fearfed attrition escalator stackstake. The latter especially raises ires ['verbolgenheid' over 'betrayal'] on the right which even now, is blissfully unaware and cowardly shy of 'by my 'fine all' god', here i face that long term consequences tailveil of hazardous substance and product are lives changing and unrecognizable making# once past the bedpost, cause pass the bedpost we all must .. the axis and pole of karma where pain and pleasure are 'cleared' [met, made .. 'verrekend' = {ac}counted], where said dangers ['forever chems', 'miracle molecules', etc] get heightened on account of the max 'vulvanerability' thereabouts, which yar average fillerfool is taken care to not quite be left op n time enuff to get his head around, truth is heavy and slow, decepzion light.

# = all eyes on the consequences, lefties [havin to make  do as made to be, Stockholm as makin the best of it, blissfully unaware of those who made it so cause, leftyism is after all, nothin but a secular christianity] ... as i said, lefties to celebrate and righties to roundly condemn them
So, how does it feel Dave, somebody who adressed you in the past, all polite and hopeful, now returnin to say you're not much different from the shortsighted rightie variety where it matters and the rest of you is like all the other torah protogamer effluent, basically. No wonder you haven't a single intelligent thing about Palestine or the tight 'rubbage' 'adjustifyin' fit 'between' race and place.

1938 Killinger & Freund: The Motorcycle That Hid Its Engine in the Front...

let me know if a video of a running specimen surfaces .... this thing blows my mind ... adapt to swale digger and presto .... dreamjob ....

When A FBI Program Goes ConActZiowned

this is the fourth in a row of similar vids but significant diffs n subtleties deserve being taken note of ..

and the voice sayd: BLOGSPLOTSPLAT on your blockbot awayblow spot my man !:!:!:!:!:!:!:!:
07/07 ----- 1Serpent -- k105 --- 10/13: {lot}

yet another 3h repetitive GW banter sesh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix9iSrHvoDg

When A FBI Program Goes Horribly Wrong - The Idaho Fireman Massacre -- GW

https://youtu.be/ix9iSrHvoDg?t=578 .. justified but odd laff

i post:
avoid being perceived as hackle raisin 'drammer' 
accept free room 17k from Erasmus Lab offer
make use of ninefornews.com network to fite PharamA


08/07 ----- 2WorldBr -- k106 --- 11/13: {lot}
https://youtu.be/ix9iSrHvoDg?t=5110
stamp for a few minutes into the main event, the story has changed once again, it's 3tier / 3stage now, the second only half as bad but working out to the same thing - the triple goddess murdered thrice, first to prevent rape op reveal, the second a failure to protect from entrapment gone live and botched, the third on the big perps own 3 kids fleeing in haste .. altho GW makes much of the prep w dam crosscapable inflatables and whatnot ..

.. in short, the man is goin madder and madder .. he really deserves a once over -X- take down by Laurence Rickels who could then blaze into a new series .. from B-Movies to Blobsized MoneyLump Investment GaimGainz [B-miggs] via same old say mold Blast n Boom Memerry Crystalmash Preventzion

Re storyb/hook change ... to sync w telltale alibi waver n weave i guess.
That 'main event set off stamp makes for a very abrupt content jump after lightish banter since the beginning .. 3h35th has a nutshell version of the multiple baited unbeknownst instagals and the baitbitin op customer busser used as fall guy lawdecoy / trophee / patsee to help the real bad guy make his getaway. This decker or dekker dude is deepest into the 3layer 'gaims of misogyny monetized.
.. all of which collided with a completey seperate strand of psyoperatrix trap set up by modern landgrabbers, redevelopers using 'integration {software} promise/bait to get a grip on controlled burns, directed disasters with ulterior profit motive, etcetera [Palentir fortified baddies twisting arms of authority authoritatively unless a bait dangle suffices, but if not, confrontationally forcin such forces into mergers, iow, fusing law enforcement w fire depts under instruction of israeli specialists].

ziodistractivism isn't topshelf distraction from ultrazioviolence until the schoolplay has even the live on scene reporter souffle a referee whistle from floorboard level coverage cover [up] 2 up the ultra violence sustain, to up [rule-out of] the zio ying yang wall throw up [.. to up the uzv overrule, to neither stop nor rule it out, never overrule IT!!].

 .. verse/version II 4 echo / emphasis / nlp scientological FBIJesuit gogo between the underlines:
Zealot sets out to stop 'rule zio version violence monopoli out or over it and/or it over] .. all hail said unnamable and never mentionable ConActZion ... despite blatant in your face for all to see empiroricklee terraprisonbreak threatening worldziocrime

posted but immediately deleted by self:
last nite's comment gone ...blocked again i guess ... for offering a free room 17k from the Erasmus Lab .. ? or for the ouchie word .. soooooooo out of place here [[[ziodistractivism]]] ......... 
336 likes for 3701x/12h before 5am .. 1/2h later 343 :: 3776/13h

101st
https://pundude.blogspot.com/2025/07/when-fbi-program-goes-conactziowned.html
When A FBI Program Goes ConActZiowned

this is the fourth in a row of similar vids but significant diffs n subtleties deserve being taken note of ..
a scrolldown at pundude factoid: first post 2 exceeds 5 counted views goes back exactly 4 years minus 3 weeks:
sharing a vid about 
"cracks in the foundation of the CCP".
http://www.patreon.com/laowhy86
http://paypal.me/cmilkrun
this reminds me of what i began saying over a year ago: the jew memery {as it has Devolved since it's awful 'hereiking' during the opium wars} is in fact a failing heads up / sino vaccine
.. to which i'll now add: [for us jewprey jewprize and jewgoy], with love, from china which shook 'm off and ended up badly shaken [despite /X\/X\ bycause of it .. and after that .. or is that 'after' somplace that aint anywhere nearly here just yet????]
title: jew memery a failing sinovax since opium wars
snake on shtick held hi fail
.. it's like my utter 'op mijn hoede' fail regards the trees n herbs poisoning neighbourfemale even while i was aware of her abusing a damaged genepool to feed the  magnate chain of care porn institutions her first born for the lifelong sack of money fee to pretend all out inclusivity rules duh supremo so nothing to see here

and by the way Gjeworge, no such thing as "good Mossad vs bad Mossad" ... there's only bad vs worse there .. and 'justiceas' catastrophically everywhere else

08/07 ----- 2WorldBr -- k106 --- 11/13: {lot}

liddul bonus to previous

 UnIntelLitLikeIzis cause itiz .. iow .. mind the flap flowin in ... mind the opsweep / speed factor / gap / scalater escapaytour scalage between chippin boulders & dustin turds and the long broken stickend: hyper run & scale away jewhiplash

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgh-YpnRuvc
Is "Unintelligible" Literature Even Worth Your Time? | Answering a Common Question
Gavin Young Philosophy

Werner Hamacher "95 Theses on Philology" | Deconstruction and Radical Philology
Gavin Young Philosophy -- 10.7K subscribers
------ Jun 7, 2025
In this lecture, I discuss Werner Hamacher's "95 Theses on Philology", one of two parts of his "Minima Philologica". In it, Hamacher attempts to theorize, investigate, and discover a path for the study of language in all its subtleties, ambiguities, and strategies. Using allusive aphorisms, Hamacher builds on ideas from deconstruction and post-Heideggerian thinking to yield an exciting attempt at a theory of the study of language, writing, and reading. Enjoy!

Join the channel for $5/month to gain access to, among other things, a monthly philosophy Zoom tailored to your educational needs! / @gavinyoung-philosophy  

Kinky Joyce: Friend or Foe in Finnegans Wake? | Desire and the Reader-Wr...

Transcript

Follow along using the transcript.


0:00
a little known fact about James Joyce is
0:02
that he had a kink or a fetish for
0:04
women's underpants and this finally
0:07
becomes the context for an entire
0:09
chapter in the first chapter of book two
0:11
of Finnegan's Wake the mime of the
0:13
Mcnick and the Maggis and in this
0:15
chapter Shem in the guise of a new
0:18
character Glug as he's called is asked
0:21
to come up and try to guess the color of
0:24
Isabelle and her 29 rainbow girls'
0:27
panties and the correct answer here is
0:30
helotrope but this word proves totally
0:34
ambiguous in the chapter first off
0:36
because it has a number of different
0:37
possible meanings and associations such
0:40
that any one guess is technically
0:42
inadequate because it's not grasping the
0:44
entirety of the other meanings it could
0:46
be seen as deficient or sliding by
0:48
without getting at the facts straight on
0:51
without understanding the facts of
0:53
feminine clothingaring as it's called
0:55
and I think that phrase is really
0:57
important because it shows how even the
0:59
enveloping structure of a text is always
1:02
airing always in a process of diverance
1:05
as Dareda would put it in this video I
1:09
would like to think and theorize about
1:11
Finnegan's Wake as a kinky text which is
1:14
to say concerned with the word or
1:16
concept kink in the double sense of a
1:20
sexual fetish or you know something
1:22
sexually unorthodox and a kind of knot
1:25
or sharp bend or twist in something that
1:28
would otherwise be straight such as a
1:29
garden hose right and this cuts off the
1:32
flow of something that would otherwise
1:33
be there thus a kink is a discontinuity
1:36
a rupture or a
1:38
lacuna and I'll go back to those latter
1:40
three later in the lecture but right now
1:44
I want to focus on how we can explicate
1:46
the nature of kink fetish and desire as
1:50
a fundamental linguistic trope and
1:53
vehicle in Finnegan's Wake
1:57
[Music]
2:02
one of the reasons this concept is so
2:04
important here is because it really gets
2:06
at the relationship between Joyce as
2:08
author and us as readers is he our
2:12
friend here trying to invite us in or is
2:15
he our foe trying to keep us at bay with
2:17
various tropes and defensive mechanisms
2:20
because one thing we know about the
2:22
dream of Finnegan's wake is that it is
2:24
filled with repression and thereby the
2:27
only way that we can get a sense of
2:29
presence is through a deferred chain of
2:33
differential marks as Dareda would put
2:35
it and in this process there are a
2:37
number of psychic mechanisms used to
2:40
distance the dreamer from his or her own
2:43
concepts ideas and
2:45
preoccupations thus Finnegan Wig's
2:47
language is by definition oblique it
2:51
works by extension and temporal deferral
2:56
as such it makes language kinky as well
3:00
by showing the kinks already present in
3:03
language in all forms of discourse it
3:06
shows that they are partial which is a
3:08
term that I use often on the channel
3:10
partial in the sense of gapladen and
3:12
biased right
3:14
so this weaponizes language and
3:17
discourse itself by making it a poignant
3:20
vehicle for desire and thereby also for
3:22
all the different manifestations that
3:24
desire can take excess disgust fear
3:28
repression anxiety depression and more
3:32
therefore Finnegan's wake is not
3:34
speaking for some teological
3:36
understanding of the mind or of the
3:39
world as Sheldon Brivik says the
3:41
discourse of Finnegan's Wake
3:43
accommodates multitudes it speaks for
3:45
multiple voices it genuinely tries to
3:49
accommodate the difference that is sort
3:52
of latent within our conception of
3:54
desire as excess and overflowing beyond
3:58
rational categories
4:00
as such the geometry of Finnegan's wake
4:03
in its sort of desirous turning over and
4:06
mulling over itself is that of a moious
4:09
strip an emobius strip is an otherwise
4:12
circular structure with a half twist in
4:15
it such that it intertwines with itself
4:18
it is interrelated and interdependent to
4:21
itself it has two sides which are really
4:24
the same side of the same structure thus
4:28
it is the oraoros but twisted again in
4:31
another dimension that the oraoros
4:34
um geometry hasn't typically allowed
4:37
for as such this is not only the
4:40
geometry of the text but also the nature
4:43
of the reader writer network he is
4:47
constantly twisting and pulling his
4:49
reader legs trying to get them to go
4:52
down rabbit holes just like the
4:53
characters and yet at the same time he's
4:55
thereby inviting them in to the
4:58
character's unconscious and letting the
5:00
characters minds run free and we are
5:04
thereby implicated in this process and
5:08
this idea of implication is really
5:10
interesting because implicate comes from
5:13
late middle English and before that from
5:15
the Latin implicatus for folded in the
5:19
past participle of
5:22
implicate is to
5:25
intertwine so we have a very interesting
5:27
case here where the reader has to
5:30
actively construct a text that is not
5:32
formally there before the reading begins
5:36
right there are sort of loose structural
5:39
indices markers and signs that point us
5:42
in certain directions but they work at
5:44
best
5:45
probabilistically they don't give us
5:47
sense
5:48
certainty they merely give us rabbit
5:52
holes to go down they give us lines of
5:54
flight as dozen would call it this
5:57
accords with Gabrielle Rangley's theory
5:59
of spectral authorship which he
6:01
elaborates in Joyce as theory
6:03
hermeneutic ethics in derided lon and
6:05
Finnegan's wake and this text goes to a
6:08
great deal to try to explain the nature
6:10
of authorship in
6:12
deconstruction because bot famously
6:14
theorized the death of the author but
6:17
wrangling actually wants to say that no
6:19
the author is not dead even dereda
6:21
acknowledged this the author is just
6:22
there as a trace or as wrangling calls
6:25
it a spectre
6:27
Therefore there is no mode of speaking
6:29
that remains undistorted by iterability
6:32
and ventriloquism he says whenever it is
6:35
consulted authorities pronouncements
6:37
emerge as the result of a negotiation
6:40
that already mixes and confuses
6:42
positions and beneath this dynamic of
6:45
displacement there is a mechanism at
6:47
work that divides even the author from
6:49
any interpretive authority in the sense
6:51
of total mastery over what they
6:53
produce right so we're getting this
6:56
implicated nature of the mobious form
7:00
right where both sides are really both
7:04
different and the same at the same
7:07
time he says language refuses to codify
7:10
a single authentic intention without
7:13
also dividing it wrenching it from
7:15
itself and transforming it in multiple
7:17
and unpredictable ways
7:20
therefore authoral meaning he says far
7:22
from constituting a pragmatic solution
7:25
that cuts through the paradoxes of those
7:27
terms is a concept structurally
7:30
analogous to them we call something a
7:32
meaning intended by the author with
7:34
reference to certain textual effects the
7:37
impossibility of distinguishing
7:39
legitimate from illegitimate effects
7:40
with absolute certainty therefore means
7:43
that the author too is a presence
7:45
constituted by our interpretive
7:47
decisions and this idea of
7:49
decision-making is really important for
7:51
Wrangley because he says that any theory
7:53
of interpretation demands that there is
7:55
some fundamental discontinuity between
7:57
the text and the interpretation that
8:00
results right that we can't get a
8:02
one-to-one correspondence between the
8:05
data quote unquote of the text of the
8:08
empirical facts of the matter to the
8:11
spectre that we invent that we claim
8:14
speaks for Joyce and in Joyce's voice as
8:18
we're doing that we are constructing
8:20
retrospectively what we see as being the
8:23
most authentic image of Joyce which is
8:25
itself based upon a number of decisions
8:28
and assumptions none of which can be
8:30
exhausted
8:32
and this is what's crucial here for our
8:34
understanding of the relationship
8:36
between Joyce and therefore his fetish
8:38
and the way that this implicates us in a
8:41
discourse of desire is that
8:43
conceptualizing authority as spectral
8:45
underlines our implication in the text
8:48
as producers of meaning on the other
8:51
hand the powers that specters
8:52
nonetheless wield including powers of
8:55
dictation can tell us that if the
8:58
meaning thus produced is not neatly
9:00
divisible into elements that partake and
9:02
elements that do not partake in the
9:04
authority bestowed by an authoral
9:05
blessing this does not mean that the
9:08
notion of authority is
9:10
abandoned joyce still leaves something
9:12
for us how did we get Finnegan's Wake
9:14
otherwise
9:16
what divides our readings from authority
9:18
is the uncertainty of their relation to
9:20
it and this uncertainty cuts both ways
9:23
it perpetuates authority in the very act
9:25
of putting it into question right just
9:28
as the Mobius strip perpetuates each
9:31
side while eacing it in the
9:33
process like Daredus Plato who inventing
9:36
Socrates takes on a debt and
9:39
responsibility towards the fictional
9:40
father figure the reader who is at the
9:43
risk of usurping the position to be
9:45
consulted is also tied to this position
9:48
as the one to be iterated and interacted
9:50
with this and I think this is very
9:52
interesting right that we are
9:54
interacting with Joyce in a fundamental
9:56
way we're having some sort of
9:58
conversation but rather than it being a
10:00
dialogue it is a polyogue and this is a
10:04
word that Finnegan's awake uses many
10:05
times in fact in in varying guises that
10:09
we are using multiple different
10:11
languages multiple different discourses
10:14
to try to understand the lack of any
10:17
meta discourse that there is no one
10:20
trope no one schema no one matrix that
10:24
can subsume the entirety of any text and
10:27
thus of any mind or anything that
10:30
desires and try to reduce it to set
10:33
mechanisms desire is by its very
10:36
definition productive in the duloarian
10:39
sense and therefore always exceeding any
10:41
single gesture because desire must
10:43
repeat itself it must propagate itself
10:46
properly speaking it's a sort of virus
10:49
that goes beyond anyone logic that is
10:51
able to
10:52
evolutionarily accompany and accommodate
10:55
any environment or vehicle but Patrick A
10:58
mccarthy clarifies in his essay a
11:00
warping process which can be found in
11:03
work in progress Joyce centenery essays
11:06
that Joyce and his reader are ultimately
11:08
partners not antagonists
11:11
if the reader cannot hope to understand
11:13
exactly what Joyce meant when he wrote
11:15
the book it is equally true that the
11:17
book lives only in the experience of its
11:19
readers and has no set meaning apart
11:21
from that experience right so where
11:23
needed why would Joyce write this and
11:25
spent 17 years on it if he didn't want
11:27
it to be read
11:29
although he makes many demands on his
11:31
readers Joyce accords them a place of
11:33
honor in keeping with Stern's dictim
11:35
that the truest respect which you can
11:37
pay to the reader's understanding is to
11:39
have this matter amicably and leave him
11:42
something to imagine as well as yourself
11:45
precisely so and it is this reliance on
11:47
the reader's cooperation not to mention
11:49
his goodwill knowledge sense of humor
11:52
patience and insomnia that defines
11:54
Joyce's attitude towards his audience
11:58
right so there's a mix of leg pulling of
12:01
occultting while at the same time a
12:03
sense of charitability and relationship
12:06
because Joyce is fundamentally
12:08
infatuated with relationships and he
12:11
wants to see that the readership that we
12:15
engage in is one of a relationship with
12:18
textuality with a fulminating excessive
12:21
medium that tries to tell us things
12:23
without communicating facts right
12:27
without claiming that what happens in
12:29
Finnegan's Wake somehow corresponds to a
12:32
world no it is beyond correspondence it
12:34
is in a sense a world of its own
12:36
isolated and yet at the same time it
12:38
always opens up and demands that it be
12:41
opened up that's why every time I'm next
12:43
to Finan's Wake I just have to open up a
12:44
passage and just read something because
12:46
it just compels me and this is a
12:48
fundamentally desirous impulse right
12:51
that we want to implicate ourselves in
12:53
the text and the text wants to implicate
12:55
itself in us that's why there's so much
12:56
self-reflexivity and doubt in Finnegan's
13:00
Wake therefore the kinky text of
13:03
Finnegan's Wake opens up and exposes
13:06
kings and analyzes them as indeterminate
13:10
spaces between any two points that
13:14
allows for play
13:16
play conceived of in the dual sense of
13:18
fun like playing a game but also play as
13:21
in the quality of limited free reign
13:25
between two like machined parts for
13:27
example right there's a little space of
13:29
play in between where it can sort of
13:31
jiggle around there is a sort of limited
13:33
movement allowed between relative
13:36
fedters
13:38
these two aspects of play are really key
13:41
to understanding the relationship of
13:43
Joyce to kings because at once we can
13:46
see that Joyce is kind of in a sort of
13:49
flagagillatory manner playing with
13:52
himself therefore it's of course
13:54
sexually explicit and filled with
13:56
innuendo and yet at the same time he's
13:58
also playing with us in the sense of
14:01
perhaps exciting us sexually but also
14:04
playing with us in the sense of two
14:07
members of some common game but thirdly
14:12
playing at our expense right as if you
14:15
play a prank on someone and they are the
14:17
sort of butt of some joke so there are a
14:20
number of different facets to
14:22
understanding Finnegan's wake as a kinky
14:24
text it is at once concerned with play
14:28
and joy and excess while at the same
14:30
time being marred in repression anxiety
14:34
disgust fear and
14:37
self-loathing therefore Finnegan's Wake
14:39
teaches us as well as leaves space for
14:42
us to enjoy play that is at once
14:44
innocent and benign and at the same time
14:47
sexually illicit and excessive this is
14:50
the reason we never kind of figure out
14:51
what the crime of Finnegan's wake
14:54
is as such I think this is a really
14:56
helpful way for approaching Finnegan's
14:58
Wake because it helps one foreground the
15:01
pleasure of the text the extent to which
15:03
it really exudes personality so I think
15:06
this idea of Finnegan's Wake as a kinky
15:08
text can be really incisive for
15:10
understanding the reading experience
15:12
understanding how Finneian's wake
15:14
privileges ambiguity such as between the
15:17
writer and reader but just in general
15:19
the various happenings that happen in
15:21
Finineian's wake are defined by
15:24
ambiguity discontinuity rupture lacuna
15:27
occultting
15:29
deference fleeing dancing and constantly
15:33
exceeding through gesture right it
15:36
doesn't exceed through conceptual leaps
15:39
without any sort of substance but write
15:42
they are filled with concrete gestures
15:45
i'm reminded of Heran's concept of the
15:48
bub of the solid word which is very
15:52
similar to what Stuart Gilbert has to
15:54
say in his prologina to work in progress
15:56
that can be found in our exagination
15:58
where he says that the word building of
16:00
work in progress is founded on the rock
16:02
of petrified language of sounds with
16:04
solid
16:06
associations and the solidity or ground
16:09
or the unground in a way of finning wake
16:13
language is desire
16:15
in all the excesses of feeling and
16:18
affect therefore I ask you to go forth
16:20
not only in reading Finnegan's Wake but
16:22
in any text by focusing on the affective
16:25
immediiacy of desire and of the text
16:28
which demands to exceed any
16:30
interpretation i think that this can
16:32
really productively understand the
16:35
experience that Joyce wants us to glean
16:36
from Finnegan's Wake as well as the sort
16:39
of political and ethical implications
16:40
that we can take from the way that we
16:42
interpret it
16:44
so that being said that's it for this
16:46
lecture i hope it's been somewhat
16:48
interesting and helpful you can check
16:49
out any of my other lectures I've done
16:51
on postmodernism German idealism gender
16:53
theory postcolonial studies and other
16:55
classic literature you can also become a
16:57
channel member for $5 a month and gain
16:59
access to among other things a private
17:01
philosophy zoom which you can tailor to
17:03
your needs i also have super thanks if
17:05
you'd just like to donate to the channel
17:06
because it really helps me purchase all
17:08
the varying books of various kinds and
17:10
bring you all this wonderful secondary
17:12
literature but no pressure care about
17:13
yourself first that's it for this
17:15
lecture and I'll see you in another one
17:20
[Music]





Kinky Joyce: Friend or Foe in Finnegans Wake? | Desire and the Reader-Writer Relationship
Gavin Young Philosophy
10.7K subscribers

212 views  Jun 8, 2025

In this lecture, I theorize Finnegans Wake as a "kinky text", using the term "kink" in its dual sense: 1) a sexual tabboo/fetish, and 2) a knot or sharp bend/twist in something otherwise straight -- thereby, a distontinuity, rupture, gap, or lacuna. Using Gabriel Renggli's concept of the spectral author, I chart the ways by which Joyce implicates his readers in himself and his text, showing how he weaves a textual geometry in the shape of a Möbius strip. Enjoy!

Music is Pierre Boulez's Piano Sonata No. 1    • Piano Sonata №.1 - Pierre Boulez (1946)  

Join the channel for $5/month to gain access to, among other things, a monthly philosophy Zoom tailored to your educational needs!
   / @gavinyoung-philosophy  



People mentioned
1 person
James Joyce
Irish novelist and poet (1882–1941)





Gavin Young Philosophy
10.7K subscribers



30:21
Rhythm in Finnegans Wake: Boulez, Zones of Intensity, and Alliterative Resistance

1:07:57
Critical Essays on Finnegans Wake | A Literature Review for Interpreting the Wake

32:47
Dissemination: Derrida and Finnegans Wake's L(e/i)tters




Syphilis Is Changing Like We've Never Seen... In Seattle
Heme Review
467K views 2 weeks ago


19:52
Sandra Bartky "On Psychological Oppression" | Autonomy in the Shackles of Patriarchy•
363 views 3 days ago

New
23:19
Giambattista Vico, "The New Science" | A Philosophy of the History of Human Ideas and Institutions
Gavin Young Philosophy
455 views 1 month ago



Rhythm in Finnegans Wake: Boulez, Zones of Intensity, and Alliterative Resistance
Gavin Young Philosophy
•
587 views 7 days ago






"De EU Is Niet Meer Te Redden" Met Ab Flipse
Hete Hangijzers
•
22K views 2 days ago



Let's Talk About James Joyce's Finnegans Wake
George Koors
•
727 views 5 months ago




Why All Knowledge is Political | Foucault and Joyce on Power and Epistemology
Gavin Young Philosophy
•
27K views 4 weeks ago



The Genius Philosophy of Kafka (And How To Use It In Your Life)
Timur Dyrdin
•
5.8K views 4 weeks ago



10,000 Subscribers Q&A!
Gavin Young Philosophy
•
442 views 11 days ago




Finnegans Wake Book 1: Complete Reading (10 hours, WAKE Podcast)
WAKE: Cold Reading Finnegans Wake
•
631 views 4 months ago





Ukraine drone attack shatters peace summit
The Grayzone
•
528 views 1 hour ago

New
Theo van Gogh interviewt Herman Brusselmans
Zihni Ozdil
•
1.3K views 18 hours ago




New
J.S. Bach - Cantata BWV 120 "Gott, man lobet dich in der Stille" (J.S. Bach Foundation)
Bachstiftung
•
42K views 3 years ago



Is "Unintelligible" Literature Even Worth Your Time? | Answering a Common Question
Gavin Young Philosophy
•
7.1K views 1 month ago




Peter Sloterdijk on Europe, Meister Eckhart, and the Spirit of Democracy
Berggruen Institute
•
6.4K views 2 days ago





New
How Solarpunk Could Solve Capitalism's Major Greed Problem
Em's Wild World
•
142K views 1 month ago
Max Blumenthal attends AI warlord conference
The Grayzone
•
355 views 51 minutes ago




New
A Conversation with DarksydePhil - Mad at the Internet (August 26, 2024)
MATI Archive #410
•
15K views 9 months ago




Finnegans Wake Audiobook || Book I Chapter 1 -- James Joyce
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐒𝐓 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐏𝐀𝐍𝐘
•
172K views 9 years ago




Beamtin wegen Kritik an Israel entlassen mit Melanie Schweizer - 99 ZU EINS - Ep. 517
99 ZU EINS
•
1.9K views 12 hours ago

New

Ryan Dawson on the genocide lead up

thumb farmer alert

 

01/05 ----- 12Mirror ---- k38 ---- 27/10: {lot}
Yahweh is a cosmic parasite - Ryan Dawson today
sorry, i fooled you too, this is a concrete, cobbles and wood video ..

moot Qs?
porn finally finding its footin w spare -none- poopshootin? .. more compost toilet choices and micro climates than genders .... ??

 -------- 98th:
https://pundude.blogspot.com/2025/04/thumb-farmer-alert.html

i admire Gariepy and his wife

equally ... together and or separately ... ... for setting a Gestalt into this world .... or lending an oldie but goodie some much needed upgrade ... 

don't let Josh Moon the Gates of Hell Bouncer and King of Modern Acceler Azionist Game Dumbage teach you different .. nor his orc armies, nerd legions and zoggy zillions

 YESTERDAY:

jf? the dusty [smith] show is up to the 4th long part in a year
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_6vhTF_OUU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzSm8C0hgqs
part 4 is hard hitting .. and real plausible.. but until a much nicer and damn near magical version is disproven i shall reserve judgement ...

Josh refers to true crime Roberta Glass prolly .. 700+ episodes, ... but he refuses to play any, makes tec excuses .. can't play his own site again ... .. rocky and holly from alberta ...
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/jfg-jean-francois-gariepy-jfgariepyneuro-the-french-pervert-the-public-space.38787/page-264
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfgtFSr4Vas
The Real Housewives of Alberta
@TheRealHousewivesofAlber-kl2dv --- 491 subscribers --- 72 videos


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6USluqkiuE
via a mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41h42L05IWw
JF tells his story - The Real Housewives of Alberta
Colonel J (The Sheriff) --- 2.36K subscribers --- 365 views  Premiered Apr 9, 2025
 

  TODAY:

watch?v=9QdiwqoAZRE
Full length video - with "She's dead" thumbnail. By minor sektur lolcow Johnny Fox ( who had a run in with grapey back in the day on kill stream)
Though to be fair Fox does watchable catfish and scambait stuff on YT mainly nowadays.
destiny confuses 2 separate times and jf finds it hard to accept her online outburst might as well apply to him at least somewhat and/or sometimes to him as to his guest 'nwg' ... but he's right, she is mostly sane ... and i love her .. and him .. for keeping the john galt 'escape hatchapatch alive ... what have we left on the way to feminance approved trillionaire smallpoxblanket coverage?

re: last few minutes here ...... Bonnell/'Destiny' confuses and/or conflates 2 separate times and different outcomes and jf finds it hard to accept the latter one, her online outburst might as well, at least somewhat and/or sometimes, apply to him as to his guest 'nwg' [she from wendigo cunttree 'membu´?] ... but he's right, she is mostly sane ... and i love her .. and him .. for keeping the john galt 'escape hatchapatch alive ... what have we left on the way to feminance approved trillionaire smallpoxblanket coverage? Can bears be taught to plant and keep an eye on the 'thrivalage' of nuttrees and their descendant become respected members of nonspeciest societies? You bet.